IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v29y2021i3p580-600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation of river restoration measures – Do residential preferences depend on leisure behaviour?

Author

Listed:
  • Lars Symmank
  • Adriano Profeta
  • Christine Niens

Abstract

The number of river restoration projects grew steadily in recent years. However, freshwater ecosystems attract diverse stakeholder groups and thus are frequently a source of conflicting interests. A growing number of studies analyses stakeholder preferences towards river restoration projects albeit without distinguishing between them. However, a differentiated analysis is highly important, since public participation in decision-making is often restricted to a limited number of stakeholder groups. We used a discrete choice experiment to unravel preference heterogeneity of local residents towards river restoration depending on individual leisure behaviour. Our results show that some user groups have contrasting preferences to the vast majority of users. This is of particular interest, as these well-organized and influencing groups are considerably small and do not represent the general opinion of residents. Our results illustrate the large challenges for decision-makers and planners who are obliged to ensure public participation in river restoration projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars Symmank & Adriano Profeta & Christine Niens, 2021. "Valuation of river restoration measures – Do residential preferences depend on leisure behaviour?," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 580-600, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:3:p:580-600
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1760792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2020.1760792
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2020.1760792?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:3:p:580-600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.