IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v29y2021i12p2340-2356.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From political motivation to scientific knowledge: classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus

Author

Listed:
  • Derk T. Trei
  • Johanna Hornung
  • Jasmin Rychlik
  • Nils C. Bandelow

Abstract

Over the past two decades, Urban Living Labs (ULL) emerged as a special derivate of policy labs. These are a relatively young phenomenon that is characterized by a strong orientation towards design thinking and the generation of evidence for policy-making processes. Research on this topic is rising, yet there is need for more empirical evidence that informs explanations of how policy labs in general and ULLs in particular are successfully de-politicizing and objectifying debates in the science-policy nexus, for example in wicked areas such as sustainable transport policy. Drawing on two ULLs in local policy communities in Germany, the central research question asked is how different types of policy labs with diverging salience levels of science and politics effectively contribute to an evidence-based debate on policy solutions. Answering this question for a topic characterized by high levels of complexity, emotions, and uncertainty potentially provides generalizable insights for different types of policy labs: The results indicate that policy labs may effectively move the debate from political motivation to scientific knowledge, but only if science is given a real role within the policy lab.

Suggested Citation

  • Derk T. Trei & Johanna Hornung & Jasmin Rychlik & Nils C. Bandelow, 2021. "From political motivation to scientific knowledge: classifying policy labs in the science-policy nexus," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(12), pages 2340-2356, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:12:p:2340-2356
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2021.1941785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:29:y:2021:i:12:p:2340-2356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.