Author
Listed:
- Keyang Li
- Perrine Dethier
- Anders Eika
- D. Ary A. Samsura
- Erwin van der Krabben
- Berit Nordahl
- Jean-Marie Halleux
Abstract
Cultural impacts in planning increasingly receive attention from both academics and practitioners around Europe. However, comparative planning cultures studies face the challenges of lacking systematic comparison and empirical evidence, especially at the micro level of planning actors’ behaviour in interaction. This article aims to fill these gaps by (1) operationalizing the concept of planning culture; and (2) measuring and comparing it. We base our operationalization on the culturized planning model (Knieling, J., & Othengrafen, F. (Eds.). (2009). Planning cultures in Europe: Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning. Farnham: Ashgate). We complement its explanatory power by building a link between planning culture and planning outcome through attitudes of planning actors. This article focuses on three attitudes: risk, trust and co-operation. To measure and compare these attitudes, we adopt three experimental economic games and conduct an experiment with public and private planning practitioners in three European countries: Belgium, the Netherlands and Norway. Both cross-country and public-private differences in these attitudes are tested in the experiment. Our experimental findings suggest that Dutch planning actors value risk aversion and trust; Norwegian planning actors value cooperation; while (French-speaking) Belgian planning actors do not value these variables that much.
Suggested Citation
Keyang Li & Perrine Dethier & Anders Eika & D. Ary A. Samsura & Erwin van der Krabben & Berit Nordahl & Jean-Marie Halleux, 2020.
"Measuring and comparing planning cultures: risk, trust and co-operative attitudes in experimental games,"
European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 1118-1138, June.
Handle:
RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:28:y:2020:i:6:p:1118-1138
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1612325
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:28:y:2020:i:6:p:1118-1138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.