IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v22y2014i12p2477-2489.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-Relational Mapping in Socio-Institutional Perspectives of Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel C. Granger

Abstract

In recent years innovation studies have extended key discussions beyond scientific knowledge into more symbolic and cultural forms, and with it brought cultural and creative industries to the centre stage of economic innovation. However, the development of more wide-ranging research approaches has failed to keep pace with the advancements occurring in conceptual debates. In this paper, the author draws on the original arguments of the social innovation discourse to highlight the importance of more socialized approaches to the study of innovation, an approach which highlights the importance of understanding more about social networks, local institutions, local scenes and environments, and relational capital. It is known that in practice, and especially with non-scientific knowledge, new ideas are mediated by social relations, institutions and all manner of other intangibles such as conversations; all of which are acknowledged in some literature but have never been part of the mainstream. In this vein, the paper outlines the contribution that spatial-relational mapping can make to the study of innovation by illuminating the social spaces of innovation in and around Coventry and Birmingham, UK, and by raising new patterns of relationships, which emphasize the existence of sector convergence, underground scenes and path lock-in.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel C. Granger, 2014. "Spatial-Relational Mapping in Socio-Institutional Perspectives of Innovation," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(12), pages 2477-2489, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:22:y:2014:i:12:p:2477-2489
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.790591
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2013.790591
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2013.790591?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:22:y:2014:i:12:p:2477-2489. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.