IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v20y2011i4p627-639.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the Future of Mobility Electric? Learning from Contested Storylines of Sustainable Mobility in Iceland

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Arthur Driscoll
  • Ásdís Hlökk Theodórsdóttir
  • Tim Richardson
  • Patience Mguni

Abstract

Planning for sustainable mobility is a complex and demanding task and the knowledge of how to trade off multiple, often conflicting, goals is not entirely clear. One of the most contentious and confounding issues in the context of urban planning has been, and continues to be, the place of the automobile within the evolving sustainable mobility paradigm. The recent emergence of strong policy and planning support for the introduction of electric vehicles raises thorny questions as to whether or not this development will be complementary to, or conflicting with, other sustainable mobility planning goals, such as the pursuit of compact cities, restrictions on automobiles, promotion of walking and bicycling, and support for public transport. The results of a recent pilot study conducted in the Reykjavik city region suggest that a strategy of provision for electric vehicles on a large scale may represent a continuation of the dominant transport engineering approach, drawing scarce financial and institutional resources away from path-breaking measures such as the efforts to create denser development patterns and promote non-motorized and public forms of transport.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Arthur Driscoll & Ásdís Hlökk Theodórsdóttir & Tim Richardson & Patience Mguni, 2011. "Is the Future of Mobility Electric? Learning from Contested Storylines of Sustainable Mobility in Iceland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(4), pages 627-639, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:627-639
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2012.665036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2012.665036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2012.665036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:20:y:2011:i:4:p:627-639. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.