IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v31y2025i7p827-849.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social trading platforms vs. mutual funds: herding tendencies and portfolio risks

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Grundke
  • Gerrit Wittke

Abstract

This paper compares herding behavior between mutual funds and social trading platforms, where retail investors manage others' money, and examines its implications for risk co-movements. Utilizing unique social trading data alongside mutual fund data, we find that social trading portfolio managers exhibit less herding than mutual fund managers according to a transaction-based herding measure. However, a market-based herding measure reveals no significant difference in herding behavior, highlighting a limitation in the robustness of the transaction-based approach. We discuss factors influencing herding behavior in the social trading environment, suggesting higher overconfidence in social trading as a key factor. From an investor perspective, herding behavior can align portfolios, increasing the likelihood of common crisis events. Although we do not find a statistically significant relationship between the degree of herding and the likelihood of joint crisis events, our findings indicate that social trading portfolios have a 5.63 percentage point lower likelihood of joint crisis events compared to mutual funds.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Grundke & Gerrit Wittke, 2025. "Social trading platforms vs. mutual funds: herding tendencies and portfolio risks," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(7), pages 827-849, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:7:p:827-849
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2024.2436904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2436904
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2436904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:31:y:2025:i:7:p:827-849. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.