IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v26y2020i16p1606-1622.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why should we invest in CoCos than stocks? An optimal growth portfolio approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hyun Jin Jang
  • Longjie Jia
  • Harry Zheng

Abstract

We investigate an optimal growth portfolio problem with contingent convertible bonds (CoCos). As the conversion risk in CoCos is closely associated with the issuer's capital structure and the stock price at conversion, we model both equity and credit risk to frame this optimisation problem. This study aims to answer two questions that (i) how investors should optimally allocate their financial wealth between a CoCo and a risk-free bond; and (ii) which approach – investing in a CoCo or in a stock issued by the same bank – could result in higher expected returns. First, we derive the dynamic of a coupon-paying CoCo price under a reduced-form approach. We then decompose the problem into pre- and post-conversion regimes to obtain closed-form optimal strategies. A comparative simulation leads us to conclude that, under various market conditions, investing in a CoCo with a risk-free bond provides a higher expected growth than investing in stock.

Suggested Citation

  • Hyun Jin Jang & Longjie Jia & Harry Zheng, 2020. "Why should we invest in CoCos than stocks? An optimal growth portfolio approach," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(16), pages 1606-1622, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:26:y:2020:i:16:p:1606-1622
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1770826
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1770826
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1770826?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:26:y:2020:i:16:p:1606-1622. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.