IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v26y2020i15p1463-1483.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quo Vadis, Raters? A frontier approach to identify overratings and underratings in sovereign credit risk

Author

Listed:
  • Hüseyin Öztürk
  • Emili Tortosa-Ausina
  • Meryem Duygun
  • Mohamed Shaban

Abstract

This study analyses overratings and underratings in sovereign credit risk. The analysis uses partial frontier methods, a technique rarely applied in this literature. By combining a robust variant of the free disposal hull (FDH) estimator, we measure both underratings and overratings for individual countries and groups of countries. Particular attention is paid to comparing pre-crisis and crisis years in order to assess possible changes in the magnitude of the deviations. Our findings indicate a remarkable degree of both overratings and underratings during the analysed period (1999–2010), which partially vanish during the last years of the sample (2008–2010) – corresponding to the financial crisis – when many downgrades took place, especially in Eurozone countries. The results allow us to emphasize the importance of monitoring these deviations for sustainable financial stability. Our results also show the potential benefits of using partial frontier methods for measuring both underratings and overratings.

Suggested Citation

  • Hüseyin Öztürk & Emili Tortosa-Ausina & Meryem Duygun & Mohamed Shaban, 2020. "Quo Vadis, Raters? A frontier approach to identify overratings and underratings in sovereign credit risk," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(15), pages 1463-1483, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:26:y:2020:i:15:p:1463-1483
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2020.1748678
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1748678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2020.1748678?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:26:y:2020:i:15:p:1463-1483. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.