IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v25y2019i5p415-434.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic portfolio theory and the low beta anomaly

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Agapova
  • Robert Ferguson
  • Dean Leistikow

Abstract

Many studies have found that portfolios of low beta stocks have higher growth rates than portfolios of high beta stocks and have concluded that low beta stocks have higher growth rates than high beta stocks. Since rational investor behavior is thought to imply that additional risk is rewarded with additional return, the alleged higher growth rates of low beta versus high beta stocks has been termed a ‘Low Beta Anomaly’ (LBA). However, it is premature to conclude that these observed LBAs are due to stocks’ differential growth rates, because the tested portfolios are traded. Stochastic Portfolio Theory (SPT) shows that traded portfolios’ growth rates can exceed the growth rates of their stocks. This paper presents several SPT models of an LBA that do not require investment constraints, irrational investor behavior, or that low beta stocks have higher growth rates than high beta stocks. These LBAs are due to reconstitution relative volatility capture that favors portfolios of low vs. high beta stocks. They result from trading profit, not differential growth rates between low and high beta stocks. Monte Carlo simulations demonstrate a reconstitution relative volatility capture LBA that is consistent with the models and the literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Agapova & Robert Ferguson & Dean Leistikow, 2019. "Stochastic portfolio theory and the low beta anomaly," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(5), pages 415-434, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:5:p:415-434
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2018.1531901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1531901
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2018.1531901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:25:y:2019:i:5:p:415-434. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.