IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v24y2018i14p1224-1251.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Further empirical evidence on block transactions below the MBR: the Spanish market

Author

Listed:
  • Inés Pérez-Soba
  • Elena Márquez-de-la-Cruz
  • Ana R. Martínez-Cañete

Abstract

There is a relatively unknown market for partial control or corporate influence in Spanish listed firms, where the control transaction size is below the legal threshold that triggers a mandatory tender offer, as this kind of deal looks for exercising some degree of control, but not a full control. The goal of this paper is to go further in its empirical analysis by exploring its distinguishing features, using as the criterion to define its transactions obtaining a seat in the board of directors. We find that these deals are mainly located in the segment of the market of large trades where the rules for private negotiations are easier to implement; the size of the block is relatively large and it is negotiated as a whole block. Besides, the most common buyer has no previous stake in the firm. We find no evidence that the buyers pay, in median, for a seat on the board of directors, but the variability of the premiums for those blocks is higher and shows that buyers that had no control position in the target firm pay more for being among largest shareholders (partial control) and less for not being among them (influence).

Suggested Citation

  • Inés Pérez-Soba & Elena Márquez-de-la-Cruz & Ana R. Martínez-Cañete, 2018. "Further empirical evidence on block transactions below the MBR: the Spanish market," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(14), pages 1224-1251, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:24:y:2018:i:14:p:1224-1251
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2017.1359197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1359197
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2017.1359197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:24:y:2018:i:14:p:1224-1251. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.