IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v23y2017i6p474-486.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk attitude in case of losses or gains – an experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Tomasz Rólczyński
  • Maria Forlicz
  • Łukasz Kuźmiński

Abstract

In order to verify some hypotheses concerning decision-making in risky choice, we conducted two experiments with real payoffs (although nonmonetary). The purpose of the article was answering following questions: does the present status influence behavior in risky choice? Does the difference in scenarios (gain/loss) influence behavior? Are people willing to pay more for insurance than an expected value of a loss (paying for transferring risk)? Is there any relationship between ability to earn and risk attitude? Our experiments show that it is possible that people taking decisions involving risk not always act the way to maximize wealth (in our case points), sometimes they are happy enough when they achieve some level of wealth. We also found that people act in a different way when they know how much is missing to achieve their goal and when they do not. Based on the obtained results, we can also say that most people are risk averse. Even in the gain scenario, people were ready to give back so many points to get the rest for sure, that what remained was less than the expected value. It is possible that there is some relationship between risk attitude and ability to get (earn) wealth in another way than lottery.

Suggested Citation

  • Tomasz Rólczyński & Maria Forlicz & Łukasz Kuźmiński, 2017. "Risk attitude in case of losses or gains – an experimental study," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 474-486, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:23:y:2017:i:6:p:474-486
    DOI: 10.1080/1351847X.2015.1062789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1062789
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1351847X.2015.1062789?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:23:y:2017:i:6:p:474-486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.