IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurjfi/v16y2010i1p57-78.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enterprise valuation with track-record ratios and rates of change

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Gonzalez Jimenez
  • Luis Blanco Pascual

Abstract

This paper proposes and tests a variant of the standard discounted cash-flow model for enterprise valuation. The cash-flow (C/F) stream to be discounted is projected as the product of the sales and the free C/F to the enterprise (FCFE)-to-sales ratio and their respective rates of change. The C/F timespan is divided into three intervals. In the first, sales and ratio change according to the company's track record. On the assumption that both industry and firm abnormal earnings disappear at a certain point, marking the beginning of the third interval, the ratio evolves over the second interval to reach the Industry's average and thereafter remains constant. On the same basis, sales grow in the third interval in accordance with the economy's long-term trend, i.e. at the long-term nominal GDP growth rate, and within the second at an average of the latter and the track-record year-on-year growth rate. The proposed variant is tested for the four largest telecommunications companies in continental Europe over a 2.5-year period. The results, together with those of the standard model, are then compared with enterprise market values to test relative performance. Examination of their respective bias (signed valuation errors) and inaccuracy (ditto unsigned) seems to indicate that the proposed variant outperforms the standard model from which it is derived, even for different assumptions about the valuation horizon and for alternative ways to estimate the values of the variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Gonzalez Jimenez & Luis Blanco Pascual, 2010. "Enterprise valuation with track-record ratios and rates of change," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 57-78.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:57-78
    DOI: 10.1080/13518470902853343
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13518470902853343
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13518470902853343?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurjfi:v:16:y:2010:i:1:p:57-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJF20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.