IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/euract/v6y1997i4p767-772.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yet more misconceptions concerning the 'uniformity' of German financial reporting

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Feige

Abstract

This paper consists of comments on the replies made by Nobes and Mueller (1997) to Feige's (1997) critique of their accounting classification models. It is argued here that Nobes' and Mueller's assumption that the German Handelsge-setzbuch covers most contentious financial reporting issues 'in detail', is not correct. This applies in particular to consolidated accounts which are an important element of German financial reporting practice. Foreign currency translation, if used for testing a classification model, is therefore no 'outlier', as argued by Nobes and Mueller. Nobes' and Mueller's idea that German financial reporting practice can be described as 'uniform' because of 'accounting charts' is not compelling, since the 'Industriekontenrahmen' (IKR) which Nobes and Mueller apparently have in mind, merely serve the purpose of providing non-compulsory frameworks for the process of 'orderly bookkeeping'. The IKR's do not lead to 'uniformity' of the more highly aggregated data published in annual reports. In addition, it would appear that the classification models by Nobes and Mueller lack a theoretical background, i.e. there is no theory to be tested in conjunction with them. In view of this shortcoming of their own models, the bold statements of Nobes and Mueller concerning the scientific soundness of some classifications in the natural sciences appear particularly questionable.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Feige, 1997. "Yet more misconceptions concerning the 'uniformity' of German financial reporting," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(4), pages 767-772.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:767-772
    DOI: 10.1080/09638189700000016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09638189700000016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09638189700000016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:6:y:1997:i:4:p:767-772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.