Artificial Intelligence Measurement of Disclosure (AIMD)
Empirical research on voluntary disclosure lacks an appropriate measurement technique for quantifying the intensity of a firm's disclosure. In this paper, I introduce artificial intelligence measurement of disclosure (AIMD), a computerised technique for measuring disclosure using artificial intelligence, which derives disclosure proxies from English-language annual reports for 10 different information dimensions without human involvement. Criterion validity tests indicate that, controlling for a robust set of covariates and multiple statistical techniques, AIMD is negatively associated with information asymmetry as proxied by spreads and PIN. Furthermore, AIMD has construct validity when compared to the AIMR disclosure rating, Standard & Poor's Transparency and Disclosure Rating, several proprietary manual disclosure scorings and companies’ own assessment of their level of disclosure as indicated by a survey. I also demonstrate the applicability of AIMD as a cost-effective technique for measuring disclosure using a sample of 127,895 firm-year observations of companies regulated by the SEC.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 20 (2011)
Issue (Month): 3 (July)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:20:y:2011:i:3:p:485-519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.