Specification and power of cross-sectional abnormal working capital accruals models in the Spanish context
Following previous research (e.g. Dechow et al., 1995; Peasnell et al., 2000), we use a simulation procedure to evaluate the specification and power of different working capital abnormal accruals models in the Spanish context. Specifically, we assess the Jones Standard model, the Modified Jones model, the Kang and Sivaramakrishnan model, the Margin model, the Jones Cash Flow model, and the Accounting Process model. Consistent with previous research, our results suggest that all the models analysed are well specified in a random sample of firms. Regarding the models' ability to detect artificially induced earnings management, the Jones Cash Flow and the Accounting Process models produce the most powerful tests in all three types of manipulation studied. In line with Peasnell et al. (2000), we find that the Margin model is more powerful than the Jones Standard and the Modified Jones models at detecting non-bad debt expense manipulation, while these two models perform better than the Margin model for revenue and bad debt manipulation. Our results also support the finding by Dechow et al. (1995) that their modified version of the Jones model is more powerful than its standard version at detecting revenue-based manipulation.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 13 (2004)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/REAR20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/REAR20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:13:y:2004:i:1:p:73-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.