IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v33y2026i3p427-460.html

“Free labour ideology” before Adam Smith: free vs slave labour in the British public debate, 1746–1776

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Paula Londe Silva

Abstract

Historians have long debated whether British abolitionism benefitted from a “free labour ideology”. Most agree that Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (1776) was the obvious source for the antislavery discourse postulating the lower productivity and higher cost of slave labour. This paper challenges this interpretation by showing how several writers mobilised the superiority of free labour to criticise colonial slavery and defend specific political agendas for the British Empire before 1776. When Smith published the Wealth of Nations, Anglo-American antislavery writers had already given political meaning to arguments regarding the superior productivity and lower cost of free labour.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Paula Londe Silva, 2026. "“Free labour ideology” before Adam Smith: free vs slave labour in the British public debate, 1746–1776," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 427-460, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:427-460
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2025.2509523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2025.2509523
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2025.2509523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:33:y:2026:i:3:p:427-460. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.