IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v33y2026i1p54-72.html

Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists

Author

Listed:
  • Emiliano Brancaccio
  • Paolo Trabucchi

Abstract

The paper discusses the call by Sabiou Inoua and Nobel laureate Vernon Smith for a return to Adam Smith based on what “experimental economics” would have in common with the approach of the classical economists. The aim of the two authors is to provide an alternative to the neoclassical approach, both as a general theory of prices and, more specifically, as an account of the working of competition. Such an authoritative call for a theoretical breakthrough is undoubtedly welcome news to all advocates of a comparative approach among alternative research programmes in economic theory. We argue, however, that Inoua and Smith fail in their aim, showing in particular that the major shortcomings of their approach ultimately derive from the rejection of Adam Smith’s distinction between “market prices” and “natural prices.”

Suggested Citation

  • Emiliano Brancaccio & Paolo Trabucchi, 2026. "Competition, experiments and price theory. On a controversial return to the classical economists," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 54-72, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:54-72
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2025.2491311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2025.2491311
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2025.2491311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:54-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.