IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v27y2020i1p49-65.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guicciardini and economic (in)equality

Author

Listed:
  • Nikola Regent

Abstract

The article examines several aspects of economic (in)equality in the writings of Francesco Guicciardini. In light of a recent erroneous portrayal of Guicciardini as an advocate of wealthy oligarchs, the article emphasises Guicciardini’s appreciation of the Spartan model of economic equality – even if it is unfeasible in the prevailing Florentine circumstances. Guicciardini, seeking to turn the polity towards the pursuit of virtue, argued for measures which would diminish the esteem for wealth in Florence. Nevertheless, Guicciardini was against heavy taxation of the richer citizens: the argument of the “equality of sacrifice” in taxation (which Guicciardini himself first formulated in writing), and the nuanced answer on this point, which he offers to the proponents of progressive taxation, are examined. The article seeks to explain the prima facie contradiction between Guicciardini’s reverence for the Spartan system and his ‘proto-libertarian’ defence of accumulated property, and the rights of the better-off citizens against expropriation. In both cases, it is argued, Guicciardini’s position is determined by his concern for virtue and the conditions favourable to its pursuit. The article stresses complexity of Guicciardini’s views.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikola Regent, 2020. "Guicciardini and economic (in)equality," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 49-65, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:49-65
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2019.1651360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2019.1651360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2019.1651360?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:27:y:2020:i:1:p:49-65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.