IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/entreg/v32y2020i7-8p492-507.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are explicit knowledge transfers clustered or diffused in the U.S. biopharmaceutical market sector?

Author

Listed:
  • David R. Williams
  • Richard W. Pouder

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to understand better the dynamics of explicit knowledge transfers in the U.S. biopharmaceutical market sector. We draw upon the entrepreneurship and economic geography literature to help explain activity in this sector. We specifically are interested in how location and other factors affect the means, geographic distance, and knowledge base distance of these transfers. We examine explicit knowledge transfers in the form of technologies and products. We examine transfers by private and publicly traded biopharmaceutical firms using a series of binary logistic regression analyses. We find that firms located in bio-clusters are more likely to transfer explicit knowledge locally compared to non-locally. We also find that private firms compared with publicly traded firms and biotechnology firms compared to pharmaceutical firms are more likely to transfer knowledge locally. Pharmaceutical firms are more likely to transfer knowledge via licensing than product acquisitions compared with biotechnology firms. Our study should be of interest to researchers, biopharmaceutical firms, entrepreneurs, and policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • David R. Williams & Richard W. Pouder, 2020. "Are explicit knowledge transfers clustered or diffused in the U.S. biopharmaceutical market sector?," Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(7-8), pages 492-507, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:32:y:2020:i:7-8:p:492-507
    DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2019.1641162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/08985626.2019.1641162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:entreg:v:32:y:2020:i:7-8:p:492-507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TEPN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.