IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v45y2026i4p482-517.html

Conical FDH estimators for testing returns to scale and making inference about changes in productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Alois Kneip
  • Léopold Simar
  • Paul W. Wilson

Abstract

Non parametric envelopment estimators are frequently used to estimate production sets, efficiency, and changes in productivity. In previous papers we provide asymptotic theory enabling inference about expected efficiency, extend these results to develop tests of (i) convexity of the production set and (ii) constant versus variable returns to scale when the production set is convex, and further extend the results to make inferences about expected changes in productivity measured by Malmquist productivity indices (MPIs), provided the production set is convex. However, convexity is a strong assumption and has been rejected in a number of empirical studies. This article extends our earlier work to fill a gap in the literature by developing asymptotic properties of a non parametric envelopment estimator of distance to the boundary of the cone spanned by a production set without requiring convexity. These new results are then further extended to make inferences about productivity change measured by MPIs and to test constant versus non constant returns to scale without requiring convexity of the production set. We revisit and extend the study of U.S. municipalities by O’Loughlin and Wilson, who rejected convexity and hence were unable to examine returns to scale or to estimate and make inferences about MPIs. Using the new methods, we (i) test and reject constant returns to scale and (ii) estimate and make inferences about MPIs without imposing convexity. We find evidence of significant increases in productivity among U.S. municipalities during 1997–2012.

Suggested Citation

  • Alois Kneip & Léopold Simar & Paul W. Wilson, 2026. "Conical FDH estimators for testing returns to scale and making inference about changes in productivity," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 482-517, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:482-517
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2025.2584132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2025.2584132
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2025.2584132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or

    for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Camilla Mastromarco & Léopold Simar, 2026. "Nonparametric spatial frontier models for productivity analysis: evidence from EU regions," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 1-21, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C18 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Methodolical Issues: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:45:y:2026:i:4:p:482-517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.