IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v45y2026i3p381-405.html

Attenuation bias vs selection bias: a multi-outcome three-stage model

Author

Listed:
  • Andrés Ramírez–Hassan
  • Tatiana Caly-Amador

Abstract

We propose a Bayesian inferential framework for a multi-outcome endogenous three-stage model that accounts for incidental truncation in outcomes (intensive margin), selection into participation (extensive margin), and access restrictions. Simulation exercises assessing finite-sample properties under various misspecification settings suggest that incorporating access restrictions and unobserved correlations is crucial. In particular, access restrictions play a critical role, as failing to account for them may introduce measurement error when correcting for selection bias. This suggests a potential tension between attenuation and selection biases. We apply our framework to two novel datasets on credit and utility demand. We extend our parametric specification to a semi-parametric one in the latter application, modeling stochastic errors using a Dirichlet process mixture. The credit demand application suggests that better socioeconomic conditions increase the probability of using credit cards but decrease the likelihood of taking bank loans. In addition, women are more likely to use credit than men, but men tend to borrow larger amounts. The utility application highlights the importance of urban areas in increasing the probability of access to piped utilities, water and gas are inelastic goods, whereas electricity is elastic.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrés Ramírez–Hassan & Tatiana Caly-Amador, 2026. "Attenuation bias vs selection bias: a multi-outcome three-stage model," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(3), pages 381-405, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:45:y:2026:i:3:p:381-405
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2025.2581289
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2025.2581289
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2025.2581289?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:45:y:2026:i:3:p:381-405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.