IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/emetrv/v44y2025i8p1144-1165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing predictability of stock returns under quantile regression: A bootstrapping double-weighted approach

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohui Liu
  • Yuzi Liu
  • Wei Long
  • Peiwen Xiao

Abstract

In financial econometrics, it is empirically challenging to test the predictability of lagged predictors with varying levels of persistence in predictive quantile regression. A recent double-weighted method developed by Cai, Chen, and Liao (2023) has demonstrated desirable local power properties for both non stationary and stationary predictors. In this article, we propose a strategy to improve the construction of the auxiliary variables in the double-weighted method. This improvement makes it applicable to a broader range of persistent types in empirical analysis. Furthermore, we propose a random weighted bootstrap procedure to address the challenges involved in conditional density estimation. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed test in correcting size distortion at the lower and upper quantiles. Finally, we apply the proposed test to reassess the predictability of macroeconomic and financial predictors on stock returns across different quantile levels, finding fewer significant predictors at the tails compared to Cai, Chen, and Liao (2023). Our results highlight that this test serves as a more conservative inference tool for practitioners evaluating the predictability of financial returns.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohui Liu & Yuzi Liu & Wei Long & Peiwen Xiao, 2025. "Testing predictability of stock returns under quantile regression: A bootstrapping double-weighted approach," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(8), pages 1144-1165, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:44:y:2025:i:8:p:1144-1165
    DOI: 10.1080/07474938.2025.2486991
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/07474938.2025.2486991
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/07474938.2025.2486991?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:emetrv:v:44:y:2025:i:8:p:1144-1165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/LECR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.