IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v38y2026i3p434-464.html

Quantifying carbon reduction from dietary behavioral changes in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Wen Su
  • Ya-Syun Syu
  • Yu-Hsin Yao

Abstract

Achieving net-zero emissions requires not only technological transitions but also changes in everyday lifestyle choices. Although many governments promote green lifestyle behaviors, few studies quantify how much carbon reduction different behaviors can realistically achieve. This study develops the Green Lifestyle Economic Behavior (GLEB) Model, a consumption-based framework that uses Taiwan’s data to estimate carbon emissions associated with dietary consumption. By decomposing emissions into two components – consumption quantity and carbon intensity – we evaluate multiple dietary behavioral scenarios. The results show that, when accounting for both per-capita carbon reduction and the likelihood of widespread adoption, eating locally and seasonally and choosing unprocessed foods offer the highest aggregate reduction potential. The GLEB Model provides a systematic method for governments to prioritize lifestyle-based mitigation policies and identify high-impact behavioral interventions. The findings demonstrate that individual actions matter; targeted behavioral changes can unlock meaningful carbon reductions with minimal disruption to daily life.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Wen Su & Ya-Syun Syu & Yu-Hsin Yao, 2026. "Quantifying carbon reduction from dietary behavioral changes in Taiwan," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 434-464, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:38:y:2026:i:3:p:434-464
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2025.2606313
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2025.2606313
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2025.2606313?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:38:y:2026:i:3:p:434-464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.