IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v38y2026i2p275-292.html

Why do trade statistics and national accounts’ trade values differ? The role of misclassification of products

Author

Listed:
  • Juan M. Valderas-Jaramillo
  • José M. Rueda-Cantuche
  • Nadim Ahmad

Abstract

International trade statistics rarely align with the corresponding trade values in national accounts due to trade asymmetries, the national accounts’ ownership principle (compared to the cross-border principle applied in trade statistics), international transport and insurance costs, and the possible misclassification of products, among other factors. This paper presents a novel method to resolve discrepancies related to the potential product misclassification. Unlike automatic balancing processes, this approach is designed to be transparent, allowing users to understand how national data can be adjusted to fit within globally balanced trade datasets and inter-country input–output tables. It also aims to improve consistency across various international initiatives such as those of Eurostat (FIGARO), OECD, UN-ECLAC and ADB, among others. The proposed method enables users to develop balanced international trade datasets, thereby substantially reducing discrepancies in national accounts’ trade values arising from product misclassification.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan M. Valderas-Jaramillo & José M. Rueda-Cantuche & Nadim Ahmad, 2026. "Why do trade statistics and national accounts’ trade values differ? The role of misclassification of products," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 275-292, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:275-292
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2026.2634802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2026.2634802
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2026.2634802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:38:y:2026:i:2:p:275-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.