IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v37y2025i4p549-571.html

Who benefits from carbon emissions? Redefining production benefits in the benefit principle

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Chen
  • Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff
  • Soo Y. Chua
  • Xiu Wei Yeap

Abstract

Existing methods for allocating carbon emissions rely on production volumes and consumption, often misaligning emissions with production benefits. This study redefines production benefits as the gains received by factor providers (e.g. wages and profits) rather than those received by producers. We propose a benefit principle that attributes carbon emissions based on both production and consumption benefits. Our findings show that this approach allocates more emissions to developed countries and fewer to developing ones, reveals higher emissions embodied in trade, and highlights distinct national patterns: in India and Iran, emissions attributed to profits exceed those from wages, while China shows higher emissions linked to capital depreciation. These results suggest that climate policies should prioritize developed economies and better address trade-related emissions. Additionally, India and Iran should focus on profit-driven emissions, while China should address capital-related emissions. This method helps reduce allocation disputes and offers broader applicability for allocating other pollutants.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Chen & Abdul Rais Abdul Latiff & Soo Y. Chua & Xiu Wei Yeap, 2025. "Who benefits from carbon emissions? Redefining production benefits in the benefit principle," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 549-571, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:549-571
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2025.2528024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2025.2528024
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2025.2528024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:37:y:2025:i:4:p:549-571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.