IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecsysr/v36y2024i1p131-160.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who bears the indirect costs of flood risk? An economy-wide assessment of different insurance systems in Europe under climate change

Author

Listed:
  • Nina Knittel
  • Max Tesselaar
  • W. J. Wouter Botzen
  • Gabriel Bachner
  • Timothy Tiggeloven

Abstract

Anticipated increase in future river flood risk highlights the need for effective flood insurance, as it enables hedging against this risk. However, its design varies significantly across countries. This study contributes to the debate on designing flood insurance mechanisms from an economy-wide perspective, considering both socioeconomic and climate changes. We apply a multi-regional computable general equilibrium (CGE) model for 2050 and find that, under current insurance market systems, flood risk causes regional GDP losses of up to −0.5%, societal welfare losses of up to −1%, and private and public consumption losses of up to −0.5% and −2.4%, respectively. These estimates are all relative to a scenario without flood risk. Our results indicate that flood risk intensifies pressure on public budgets. We find that insurance market reforms, including a higher degree of risk-sharing, mandatory purchase requirements, and public reinsurance, can alleviate adverse welfare effects and the burden on public budgets.

Suggested Citation

  • Nina Knittel & Max Tesselaar & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Gabriel Bachner & Timothy Tiggeloven, 2024. "Who bears the indirect costs of flood risk? An economy-wide assessment of different insurance systems in Europe under climate change," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(1), pages 131-160, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:131-160
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2023.2272211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09535314.2023.2272211
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09535314.2023.2272211?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:36:y:2024:i:1:p:131-160. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CESR20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.