IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Aggregation Versus Disaggregation In Input-Output Analysis Of The Environment

Listed author(s):
  • Manfred Lenzen
Registered author(s):

    Analysts carrying out input-output analyses of environmental issues are often plagued by environmental and input-output data existing in different classifications, with environmentally sensitive sectors sometimes being aggregated in the economic input-output database. In principle there are two alternatives for dealing with such misalignment: either environmental data have to be aggregated into the input-output classification, which entails an undesirable loss of information, or input-output data have to be disaggregated based on fragmentary information. In this article, I show that disaggregation of input-output data, even if based on few real data points, is superior to aggregating environmental data in determining input-output multipliers. This is especially true if the disaggregated sectors are heterogeneous with respect to their economic and environmental characteristics. The results of this work may help analysts in understanding that disaggregation based on even a small amount of proxy information can improve the accuracy of input-output multipliers significantly. Perhaps, these results will also provide encouragement for preferring model disaggregation to aggregation in future work.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Economic Systems Research.

    Volume (Year): 23 (2011)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 73-89

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:23:y:2011:i:1:p:73-89
    DOI: 10.1080/09535314.2010.548793
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecsysr:v:23:y:2011:i:1:p:73-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.