IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ecinnt/v33y2024i1p26-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Independent and major equity market and commodity return sources around the time of hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling revolution: a differences-in-decompositions approach

Author

Listed:
  • Scott Alan Carson

Abstract

Fracking and unconventional drilling have revolutionized international oil and natural gas production. Fracking increases the likelihood of well completion and decreases oil and gas equity and commodity market risk. Oil and gas Majors are producers with the greatest time and liquidity in the industry and are the largest integrated producers. Independents are smaller upstream, midstream, and downstream producers that have different capital and infrastructure and are less liquid than Majors. The fracking and unconventional recovery transition decreased returns to Independent equity market returns more than the Majors equity market decrease. Major oil returns increased with the transition by more than Independents. Independent equity returns across groups were higher after the transition than Majors both across and within groups. Fracking technology increased the likelihood of successful well completion, and with lower financial market risk, equity returns decreased in the post-fracking period.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott Alan Carson, 2024. "Independent and major equity market and commodity return sources around the time of hydraulic fracking and horizontal drilling revolution: a differences-in-decompositions approach," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 26-44, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:26-44
    DOI: 10.1080/10438599.2022.2134126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10438599.2022.2134126
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10438599.2022.2134126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ecinnt:v:33:y:2024:i:1:p:26-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GEIN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.