IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v43y2026i2p197-213.html

Pandemic solidarity and post-COVID-19 fragmentation: civil society’s shifting landscape in Cape Town

Author

Listed:
  • Doruk Işıkçı

Abstract

This article examines the relationships, dynamics, and shifting landscape of civil society organisations (CSOs) in Cape Town during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Based on interviews, participant observation, and document analysis in the neighbourhoods of Muizenberg and Vrygrond/Capricorn, the study investigates how CSOs rapidly mobilised to address food insecurity and social needs, filling gaps in the state’s social protection response. While the achievements of CSOs during the crisis highlighted their vital position within the social safety net and raised hope for societal change, the post-pandemic period exposed structural divisions and inequalities among CSOs. The paper argues that differences in organisational scale and formalisation produced starkly uneven post-pandemic outcomes, with large-scale CSOs expanding their influence while others dissolved or struggled to sustain their activities. The decline in volunteerism and donations, growing dependency, asymmetric power relations, and emerging tensions have undermined the horizontal solidarity that had united diverse actors during the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Doruk Işıkçı, 2026. "Pandemic solidarity and post-COVID-19 fragmentation: civil society’s shifting landscape in Cape Town," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(2), pages 197-213, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:197-213
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2025.2592820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2592820
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2592820?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:2:p:197-213. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.