IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v43y2026i1p91-109.html

Evaluating household sanitation in flood-prone informal settlements: a case study from Chipangara, Beira (Mozambique)

Author

Listed:
  • Michael M. Santos
  • Ana Teresa Vaz Ferreira
  • João C.G. Lanzinha

Abstract

Safely managed sanitation (SDG 6.2) remains a challenge in flood-prone peri-urban settlements, where environmental, infrastructural, and governance constraints intersect. This study examines household sanitation in Chipangara Ward, Beira (Mozambique), using surveys (n = 52), facility inspections, and stakeholder interviews. While previous studies focused on cities like Maputo, Beira’s flood-exposed informal settlements remain under-researched. Findings reveal that 78% of households rely on unlined pit latrines, 65% report seasonal overflow, and 61% have pits within 10 m of shallow wells. Barriers to upgrading include insecure tenure, high emptying costs, and poor drainage. Alternating twin-pit pour-flush systems emerged as the most acceptable option (62%), though uptake is constrained by limited technical capacity and weak institutional support. Although based on 2015–2016 data, cholera outbreaks and infrastructure failures reinforce policy relevance. We argue for phased investments in flood-resilient sanitation, paired with land tenure reform, co-planned drainage, and technical assistance to reduce fecal exposure and enhance resilience.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael M. Santos & Ana Teresa Vaz Ferreira & João C.G. Lanzinha, 2026. "Evaluating household sanitation in flood-prone informal settlements: a case study from Chipangara, Beira (Mozambique)," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 91-109, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:91-109
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2025.2609704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2609704
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2609704?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:91-109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.