IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v43y2026i1p59-73.html

Wildlife tourism destination dilemma: The interplay between tourism development, conservation, and community wellbeing

Author

Listed:
  • Cynthia Richter Ojijo
  • Robert Steiger

Abstract

Residents’ perceptions with respect to tourism developments and conservation interventions in protected areas are rarely considered when considering the development of nature-based destinations. A qualitative study was conducted involving focus groups consisting of (all Masai tribe people residing in the greater Maasai Mara). Results show that residents are largely aware of the benefits of wildlife tourism to the community. However, they are sensitive about conservation interventions that disregard their traditional practices. The results also revealed vulnerabilities and a need to reflect on the status of residents’ attitudes towards and perceptions of tourism development and conservation interventions. This study therefore extends existing research knowledge by highlighting factors which influence residents’ current positive and negative perceptions of wildlife conservation interventions and deriving some implications for inclusive conservation and tourism development strategies in protected areas from the perspective of residents.

Suggested Citation

  • Cynthia Richter Ojijo & Robert Steiger, 2026. "Wildlife tourism destination dilemma: The interplay between tourism development, conservation, and community wellbeing," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 59-73, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:59-73
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2025.2604706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2604706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2604706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:43:y:2026:i:1:p:59-73. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.