IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v42y2025i2p251-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The impact of competition law remedies on public interest

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan Klaaren
  • Karissa Moothoo Padayachie
  • Olwethu Shedi

Abstract

Public interest considerations have gained increased prominence within South Africa’s competition regime. The Competition Act’s merger regime now also includes provisions related to enhancing the economic participation of SMEs and HDPs as well as to creating employee share ownership schemes (ESOPs). Despite this, there is limited research evaluating whether public interest conditions have been able to achieve their desired/intended impact or the rationale behind the selection of remedies. This paper attempts to fill this gap by drawing on fieldwork interviews and data. We examined more closely the choice of public interest remedy and the factors which informed this choice. We found that while the competition authorities were initially conservative in their approach to the application of public interest remedies, this has shifted to be more interventionist. We have identified several common issues which arose though our fieldwork interviews and make key recommendations that should be of contemporary policy interest to the competition law and policy practicing community.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Klaaren & Karissa Moothoo Padayachie & Olwethu Shedi, 2025. "The impact of competition law remedies on public interest," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 251-274, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:251-274
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2025.2503147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2503147
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2025.2503147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:42:y:2025:i:2:p:251-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.