IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v39y2022i4p498-515.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promise or precarity? South African attitudes towards the automation revolution

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin J. Roberts
  • Steven L. Gordon
  • Jarè Struwig
  • Narnia Bohler-Muller
  • Michael Gastrow

Abstract

Rapid technological advancement has prompted growing debate about the promise and challenges of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) for societies. Some believe it will improve efficiency, productivity and quality of life, while others emphasise the risk of job loss, inequality and social exclusion. Despite the salience of these changes for human development, public opinion research on these issues remains limited in South Africa. Using data from the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS), we examine the extent and determinants of the public’s acceptance of robots and automation. The findings suggest that aversion to such technological change remains fairly high, and is informed by age, class, perceived labour market vulnerability, scientific knowledge, and confidence in government to manage adverse human consequences. The article concludes by arguing that national 4IR policy framework needs to consider the reservations expressed by many South Africans, and develop measures to protect the dignity and well-being of citizens across the life course.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin J. Roberts & Steven L. Gordon & Jarè Struwig & Narnia Bohler-Muller & Michael Gastrow, 2022. "Promise or precarity? South African attitudes towards the automation revolution," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 498-515, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:39:y:2022:i:4:p:498-515
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2021.1978932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2021.1978932
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2021.1978932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:39:y:2022:i:4:p:498-515. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.