IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/deveza/v31y2014i6p796-811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service delivery frameworks as instruments of citizen empowerment: A tale of two experiences, India and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Kariuki
  • Zwelakhe Tshandu

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative assessment of South Africa and India's service delivery improvement strategies, challenges, successes and lessons learnt in advancing their service delivery reform programmes. The cardinal argument in the paper is that the public administrative systems adopted and inherited in the post-democratic epochs in India and South Africa were incapable of meeting the service delivery needs of their respective citizens. They epitomised the traditional and hierarchical public administrative systems that were the object of reforms in the 1990s. The reform initiatives also coincided with global reforms on public administration systems taking place under the aegis of the new public management framework. A key feature of new public management is its application of private-sector ideas to the public sector, such as individual accountability. The paper further undertakes a comparative review of service delivery improvement frameworks of South Africa ( Batho Pele ) and India ( Sevottam ) in relation to their objectives and implementation modalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Kariuki & Zwelakhe Tshandu, 2014. "Service delivery frameworks as instruments of citizen empowerment: A tale of two experiences, India and South Africa," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 796-811, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:31:y:2014:i:6:p:796-811
    DOI: 10.1080/0376835X.2014.952401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0376835X.2014.952401
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0376835X.2014.952401?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:31:y:2014:i:6:p:796-811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.