What do we know about health service utilisation in South Africa?
This paper compares data from two household surveys to assess the effect of questionnaire design on estimated use of health services and analyses this across geographic areas and different groups. Deficiencies in the design of Statistics South Africa's General Household Survey led to a substantial underestimation of utilisation (capturing less than a third of visits). The South Africa Consortium for Benefit Incidence Analysis survey, which was more comprehensive, indicated that three out of four outpatient visits are to public sector facilities. Medical scheme membership is the most important predictor of using a private provider, particularly for inpatient care. Socioeconomic status and rural versus urban residence also influence overall utilisation rates and use of public versus private providers. It is critical to improve the design of routine household surveys to monitor utilisation patterns during the implementation of the proposed health system reform.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 29 (2012)
Issue (Month): 5 (December)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/CDSA20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/CDSA20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:deveza:v:29:y:2012:i:5:p:704-724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.