IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v37y2026i3p452-475.html

The political economy of the state of siege in the Democratic Republic of Congo

Author

Listed:
  • Christian S. Otchia
  • Oasis Kodila-Tedika

Abstract

Civil conflict and institutional failure represent persistent barriers to economic development in resource-rich regions, yet the effectiveness of emergency governance interventions remains poorly understood. We examine the causal impact of the Democratic Republic of Congo’s 2021 State of Siege, which transferred administrative authority from civilian to military officials in North Kivu and Ituri provinces to address escalating violence and governance failures. Exploiting the quasi-experimental variation in treatment assignment across eastern provinces, we employ Matrix Completion methods to construct counterfactual outcomes using granular incident-level data from the Kufatilia Artisanal and Small-scale Mining Tracker spanning 2019-2023. We find that the State of Siege failed to achieve significant improvements in any measured outcome. Child labor, corruption, environmental degradation, mining disputes, roadblocks, and violence persisted at levels consistent with pre-intervention trajectories despite substantial expansion of military authority and resources. These results underscore the limitations of security-centric approaches in fragile states and highlight the need for comprehensive institutional reforms that simultaneously address coercive capacity, fiscal infrastructure, and legal frameworks to break cycles of violence and resource predation.

Suggested Citation

  • Christian S. Otchia & Oasis Kodila-Tedika, 2026. "The political economy of the state of siege in the Democratic Republic of Congo," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 452-475, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:3:p:452-475
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2025.2540299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2025.2540299
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2025.2540299?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:3:p:452-475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.