IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v37y2026i3p367-394.html

Paying the full blood tax: combat exposure and mortality among French WW1 soldiers

Author

Listed:
  • Olivier Guillot

Abstract

Based on individual-level data from military registers, this paper explores the trajectories of French conscripts during the Great War. The sample studied consists of more than 20,000 men of the recruitment classes of 1900 to 1914. Besides a descriptive analysis, which aims at providing both a statistical portrait of conscripts and an insight into their wartime paths, regression analyses are carried out to identify factors associated with (1) fitness for armed service, (2) assignment to a civilian position, (3) infantry assignment, and (4) war mortality. The main focus is on whether there were inequalities in combat exposure and mortality in relation to socioeconomic status. The results suggest that some social groups were more exposed to war violence than others. In particular, farmers were more likely to be considered fit to fight than industry/craft workers and (most of) men working in the tertiary sector. They were also more likely to join the war as infantrymen and less likely to move to a civilian position. All this partly explains why mortality was higher in this group. The differences in mortality risk according to socioeconomic status were, however, of lower magnitude than those associated with military characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Olivier Guillot, 2026. "Paying the full blood tax: combat exposure and mortality among French WW1 soldiers," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 367-394, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:3:p:367-394
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2025.2535385
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2025.2535385
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2025.2535385?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:3:p:367-394. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.