IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v37y2026i1p94-116.html

Warming, cooling, commodity prices, and conflict: do UN peacekeeping troops reduce the effects?

Author

Listed:
  • Thorsten Janus

Abstract

The conflict literature suggests that UN peacekeeping operations (PKOs) reduce the death toll due to armed conflict. In contrast, deviations from moderate temperatures and changes in commodity prices might increase conflict. In this paper, I ask whether additional UN troops in countries with preexisting PKOs and active conflicts reduce the harmful effects of deviations from moderate temperatures and fluctuations in commodity prices on the intensity of conflict. In other words, do PKOs increase resilience? First, I develop a conceptual framework relating mission size to the effects of temperature and commodity prices. Second, I estimate the effects in a monthly country-level panel of PKOs with UN troops from 1990 to 2019. I find that deviations from moderate temperatures, negative shocks to commodity prices, and both negative and positive price shocks in oil exporters increase the conflict-related death toll. However, at the mean level of peacekeeping troops, countries are largely protected. I conclude that policy-makers might benefit from increasing peacekeeping troops in areas exposed to extreme temperatures or fluctuations in commodity prices.

Suggested Citation

  • Thorsten Janus, 2026. "Warming, cooling, commodity prices, and conflict: do UN peacekeeping troops reduce the effects?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 94-116, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:94-116
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2025.2533757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2025.2533757
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2025.2533757?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:37:y:2026:i:1:p:94-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.