IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v36y2025i7p975-989.html

Fertile ground for conflict: evidence revisited using spatial first differences

Author

Listed:
  • Lotanna E. Emediegwu
  • Jubril O. Animashaun
  • Uzoma Iloanugo

Abstract

In this paper, we revisit the empirical evidence regarding the effect of variations in soil fertility on violence at the local level. Recent evidence shows that as input (fertilizer) prices rise, poor soil productivity exacerbates income inequality and increases the tendency for conflict within and across ethnic groups, especially where soil fertility is more heterogeneous. However, spatial modeling with dense observational units in physical space is susceptible to spatial dependence and heterogeneity. Tackling such econometric issues requires a robust research design to address unobserved heterogeneity. Our main contribution is methodological: we use local soil nutrient availability measurements to proxy soil fertility and employ the spatial first differences (SFD) approach to investigate the effect of soil quality on local conflict. We show that soil nutrient heterogeneity is associated with conflicts and that this relationship is independent of climatic factors and fertilizer prices. Regarding policy, our results suggest that encouraging investment in agricultural practices that protect soil productivity might be important for reducing resource-related conflict in developing regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lotanna E. Emediegwu & Jubril O. Animashaun & Uzoma Iloanugo, 2025. "Fertile ground for conflict: evidence revisited using spatial first differences," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 975-989, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:36:y:2025:i:7:p:975-989
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2025.2456780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2025.2456780
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2025.2456780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:36:y:2025:i:7:p:975-989. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.