IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v35y2024i2p174-191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insecurity and Ambition: Dual Drivers of Chinese Innovation?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Aum
  • Fei-Ling Wang

Abstract

This article seeks to explain why some nations make greater efforts than others do to innovate. We examine for our case study the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China), which has emerged over the past several decades as a global technology leader and remains committed to bolstering its science and technology (S&T) capabilities. Applying a modified theory of ‘creative insecurity,’ we examine whether the balance between external and internal threats explains the variation in China’s innovation efforts. The hypothesis: when faced with greater threats from abroad than at home, China will have increased its innovation endeavors, measured by its innovation-related policies and research and development (R&D) intensity. Our mixed methods approach finds some support for this hypothesis. Our initial theory, however, seems unable to account for the observation that China also increased its R&D intensity even when external threats decreased and its internal security remained stable. Thus, we introduce a complementary theory of ‘creative ambition,’ which proposes that China’s efforts to innovate may not be merely defensive in nature but also offensive in intent to expand the PRC’s power and influence abroad. We conclude with potential theoretical and policy implications of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Aum & Fei-Ling Wang, 2024. "Insecurity and Ambition: Dual Drivers of Chinese Innovation?," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(2), pages 174-191, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:174-191
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2022.2155903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2022.2155903
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2022.2155903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:2:p:174-191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.