IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v35y2024i1p109-127.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Service-Length Obligations on Occupational Selection: Evidence from West Point Graduates

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Redman
  • Kyle Greenberg

Abstract

This paper estimates the effect of the U.S. Army’s June 2020 decision to increase the service obligation for Army aviators from six to ten years on West Point cadets’ preferences for aviation. We use a difference-in-differences identification strategy, exploiting how the policy took effect after the Class of 2021 submitted four sets of interim preferences but before cadets submitted two final sets of preferences, using preferences from cadets in the Classes of 2015 to 2020 to form counterfactual outcomes. The increased service obligation made aviation less popular, reducing the percentage of cadets who ranked aviation as their first choice by 4.1 percentage points (baseline of 18.5%) and increasing the percentage of cadets who ranked aviation as among their three lowest choices by 6.9 percentage points (baseline of 8.9%). The reduction in aviation’s popularity is most pronounced among cadets with above-median grade-point-averages, above-median aviation talent scores, and above-median SAT scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Redman & Kyle Greenberg, 2024. "The Effect of Service-Length Obligations on Occupational Selection: Evidence from West Point Graduates," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 109-127, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:109-127
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2022.2101199
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2022.2101199
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2022.2101199?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:109-127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.