IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v33y2022i1p77-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Valuation Responses to Random Changes in Perceived Risk: The Impact of Terrorism on the Defence Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Jamie Fraser
  • Gilles Carbonnier

Abstract

This study explores the impact of random changes in risk perceptions that occur as a result of terrorist attacks by examining abnormal variations in defence sector valuations. Using a market model event study methodology, the market impacts of three different sets of terror events are measured: Mass casualty events, events that occur in OECD countries, and events that occur in BRICS countries. The findings are tested against a series of explanatory variables that capture characteristics of the domestic defence sector for 21 country-level sector indices and characteristics of the event itself. Results demonstrate that the response of the defence sector to terror events depends more on event characteristics than economic characteristics, contrary to much of the prevalent literature. We also find that speculation in the defence sector persists for several days following an attack indicating that investors broadly expect a military response, particularly in the case of mass casualty events.

Suggested Citation

  • Jamie Fraser & Gilles Carbonnier, 2022. "Valuation Responses to Random Changes in Perceived Risk: The Impact of Terrorism on the Defence Sector," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 77-92, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:77-92
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2020.1794530
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2020.1794530
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2020.1794530?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:77-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.