IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v32y2021i4p451-467.html

Is Oil Political? From the Perspective of Geopolitical Risk

Author

Listed:
  • Chi -Wei Su
  • Meng Qin
  • Ran Tao
  • Nicoleta -Claudia Moldovan

Abstract

This paper investigates the political property of oil from the perspective of geopolitical risk (GPR). We explore the relationship between GPR and oil price (OP) by performing the full-sample and subsample rolling-window bootstrap Granger causality tests. We find that wars will lead to an increase in OP but that low GPR cannot lead to an immediate decline in price. This finding can also be explained by economic crises, which can make OP soar while GPR is low. In turn, the rise in OP has a positive impact on GPR. The oil market has a significant interaction with geopolitical events, which reflects the pattern of global politics, so we can conclude that oil has a political property. In the context of a tense and complex global relationship, the world can benefit from the political property of oil to prevent GPR, which can in turn facilitate an accurate prediction of OP to reduce the adverse effects of large fluctuations in the oil market.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi -Wei Su & Meng Qin & Ran Tao & Nicoleta -Claudia Moldovan, 2021. "Is Oil Political? From the Perspective of Geopolitical Risk," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 451-467, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:451-467
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2019.1708562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2019.1708562
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2019.1708562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:32:y:2021:i:4:p:451-467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.