IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/defpea/v27y2016i2p258-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Defence-specific inflation -- the Swedish perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Nordlund

Abstract

This article uses a Swedish perspective and context to illustrate general, theoretical and applied, discussions on defense-specific inflation, productivity in defense, cost escalation of defense equipment, absolute and relative defense capability plus the construction and use of defense price indices. Sweden uses a Defense Price Index (FPI) which is a composite index of different civilan, non-defense, indices to “automatically” adjust the defense budget for price changes. This should ideally allow decision makers to concentrate on incremental decisions and their economic consequences when deciding on a new defense budget. This approach requires a high precision from FPI in targeting defense inflation. The problems with achieving such a precise index are illustrated in the article. Critical points, in particular, are defining and measuring productivity in defense and price and/or cost escalation of defense equipment. Another complication is that defense, and not only defense equipment, is a “tournament good” where the most important capability is the relative capability compared mainly with potential opponents in military conflicts and not the absolute capability. Since Sweden recently abolished conscription there are reflections on opportunity costs of conscription in the article as well as results from Swedish and other studies on cost escalation of defense equipment.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Nordlund, 2016. "Defence-specific inflation -- the Swedish perspective," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 258-279, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:258-279
    DOI: 10.1080/10242694.2015.1096571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10242694.2015.1096571
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10242694.2015.1096571?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:defpea:v:27:y:2016:i:2:p:258-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GDPE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.