IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v46y2025i5p575-589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Postcolonial ecofeminist responses to the International Labour Organisation’s Just Transition framework

Author

Listed:
  • Sharmini Nair

Abstract

Climate change has been impactful to workers across the globe. To help labour transition into a green economy equitably, workers devised the concept of just transition which includes a gender element. One interpretation of just transition and gender is through the ILO’s Just Transition framework. While a positive move for the organisation, analysis of what this might mean for women in developing countries is absent in scholarship. Thus, this research begins with the query: How are the descriptions of women in previously colonised spaces in the ILO’s Just Transition framework compatible with postcolonial ecofeminist works? The anchoring method is Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) which provides guiding instructions to study power through language. Further, utilising postcolonial ecofeminist scholarship, this research helps to uncover points of tension in the ILO’s Just Transition framework pertaining to women’s agency, which would otherwise be overlooked. This research concludes that the ILO’s Just Transition framework’s gender equity project is faulty due to its misrepresentation of women’s skills and capacities, its incorrect prescription of solutions based on these misrepresentations and the misrepresentation that gender equity is limited to women’s rights issues.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharmini Nair, 2025. "Postcolonial ecofeminist responses to the International Labour Organisation’s Just Transition framework," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(5), pages 575-589, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:46:y:2025:i:5:p:575-589
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2025.2487815
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2025.2487815
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2025.2487815?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:46:y:2025:i:5:p:575-589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.