IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v46y2025i12p1413-1438.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biometric coloniality: digital consensus and the biometric state in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Victor Chidubem Iwuoha
  • Martin Doevenspeck

Abstract

This article frames the concept of biometric coloniality of power in the Global South – to explain how alliances of powerful global institutions, big tech companies and the compliant emerging biometric states operate on the basis of a lucrative digital consensus to carry out techno-­capitalist biometric ID interventions, which reproduce colonial relations of domination. We use Nigeria’s experience and examples from other African countries to demonstrate that the emergence of biometric states is linked to specific interconnected spaces of biometric data struggle and exploitation where the uses/abuses of biometric data are performed and contested. This article maps out new biometric orders of power at multiple levels/scales, and explicitly draws out ways biometric categories and social hierarchies are used to produce racialised and gendered subjects. The article argues that biometric coloniality inherently creates a biometric state with a peculiar character of biometric dysfunctionality and authoritarianism, both effectively institutionalised to the exclusion and disempowerment of the citizens/biometric subjects. We conclude that the chain of unbridled extraction of digital data, its commodification and dispossession, which is bounded by digital consensus, can only be broken by the conscious awakening of digital subjects.

Suggested Citation

  • Victor Chidubem Iwuoha & Martin Doevenspeck, 2025. "Biometric coloniality: digital consensus and the biometric state in Africa," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 1413-1438, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:46:y:2025:i:12:p:1413-1438
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2025.2539731
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2025.2539731
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2025.2539731?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:46:y:2025:i:12:p:1413-1438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.