IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v43y2022i1p225-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Has Xi Jinping made China’s political system more resilient and enduring?

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Tsang
  • Olivia Cheung

Abstract

This article offers a contextualised examination of whether Xi Jinping Thought, the latest rendition of Marxism-Leninism that functions as China’s ideology, has made China’s political system more sustainable. By scrutinising Xi’s speeches and writings since he came to power in 2012, we demonstrate that his vision is premised on modifying consultative Leninism, China’s post-Deng Xiaoping political framework, with strongman rule. This is intended to revitalise the Chinese Communist Party as a Leninist instrument to deliver comprehensive leadership, upgrade China’s economy, Sinicise Marxism, nurture a party-centric nationalism, enhance legitimacy and claim global leadership on the world stage. In the process, he has revived the Maoist mass line to induce people to embrace national goals set by the Party, ultimately to persuade them that China’s Leninist party-state is more ‘democratic’ and better at serving them than any other political system. We found that Xi’s measures have enhanced the capacity of China’s consultative Leninist state and thus the resilience of the regime in the short term. However, the substitution of collective leadership by strongman rule, and the end of predictable power transition by abolishing a term limit for himself, have undermined institutionalisation and reduced the endurance of the system in the long term.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Tsang & Olivia Cheung, 2022. "Has Xi Jinping made China’s political system more resilient and enduring?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(1), pages 225-243, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:43:y:2022:i:1:p:225-243
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2021.2000857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2021.2000857
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2021.2000857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:43:y:2022:i:1:p:225-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.