IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v42y2021i6p1365-1383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Wartime protected area governance: the case of Colombia’s Alto Fragua Indiwasi National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Gorricho
  • Markus Schultze-Kraft

Abstract

Despite its relevance for conservation in biodiversity hotspots, many of which are in the Global South and display a record of violent conflict, the relationship between protected area governance and armed conflict is underexplored. While a rich literature on protected area governance documents the existence of different governance types, ranging from state-led to community-organised conservation initiatives, thus far scholars have not examined in any depth what kinds of protected area governance arrangements and institutions emerge and operate under conditions of violent conflict. Working with a neo-institutionalist framework, the present article provides evidence regarding the impact of armed conflict on one protected area governance system in Colombia: Alto Fragua Indiwasi National Park in the southern department of Caquetá. The analysis is based on a review of the existing literature on protected area governance and armed conflict and in-depth fieldwork with key park and other stakeholders, carried out in Colombia in 2016. The research finds that despite the formidable challenges faced by the National Park Team amid armed conflict, certain conservation outcomes could still be achieved as a result of the adaptation of the park governance system.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Gorricho & Markus Schultze-Kraft, 2021. "Wartime protected area governance: the case of Colombia’s Alto Fragua Indiwasi National Park," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(6), pages 1365-1383, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:42:y:2021:i:6:p:1365-1383
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2021.1892482
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2021.1892482
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2021.1892482?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:42:y:2021:i:6:p:1365-1383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.