IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v41y2020i7p1103-1121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gaps in knowledge about local peacebuilding: a study in deficiency from Jos, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Reina C. Neufeldt
  • Mary Lou Klassen
  • John Danboyi
  • Jessica Dyck
  • Mugu Zakka Bako

Abstract

The emphasis on local or hybrid efforts in peacebuilding literature brings front and centre the importance of being rooted within a particular context, with leadership and vision for social change and justice proffered by local actors. This is the same emphasis found in development literature and a necessary foundation for transformation. Scholars and practitioners nevertheless also note a role for outsiders in supporting local efforts (eg Lederach in 2005). Yet a significant challenge arises for outsiders, and to some extent local actors: how do you know what was tried or is underway that you might support or from which you might learn? This paper reports findings from a collaborative research project that examined the gap between the practice of peacebuilding locally and internationally available ‘knowledge’ via publications produced on local peacebuilding in Jos, Nigeria, between 2001 and 2008. It identifies a staggering gap between efforts and knowledge in the form of publications. The paper discusses the implications of the findings in terms of what it means for outsiders when thinking about helping resource local transformation efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Reina C. Neufeldt & Mary Lou Klassen & John Danboyi & Jessica Dyck & Mugu Zakka Bako, 2020. "Gaps in knowledge about local peacebuilding: a study in deficiency from Jos, Nigeria," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 1103-1121, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:41:y:2020:i:7:p:1103-1121
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2020.1761253
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2020.1761253
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2020.1761253?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:41:y:2020:i:7:p:1103-1121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.