IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ctwqxx/v40y2019i3p595-611.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why madrassah education reforms don’t work in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Mohsin Bashir
  • Shoaib Ul-Haq

Abstract

Despite global pressure and national security concerns, the efforts of the Government of Pakistan to reform the madrassah system have proven to be futile. Extant literature on madrassah reform challenges relies overwhelmingly on information provided by governments and experts situated outside of these institutions. While these studies and reports present important findings and viable analysis on madrassah systems; most of the research fails to give voice to the major stakeholders of this system itself, such as the administration staff, teachers, students and parents. Our study fills this crucial gap by conducting semi-structured interviews and field observations inside Pakistani madaris (plural for madrassah) and their professional associations. We find that these madaris have been reluctant to participate in policy interventions offered by the government due to a major trust deficit brought on by differences over financial and curriculum regulation, degree recognition and the government’s role in shaping popular perceptions about madaris. This reluctance has turned down attempts for madrassah reformation and has in turn made them vulnerable to radicalisation. We conclude with policy recommendations for more effective government reforms and a stronger relationship between madrassah representatives and the Government of Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohsin Bashir & Shoaib Ul-Haq, 2019. "Why madrassah education reforms don’t work in Pakistan," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 595-611, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:40:y:2019:i:3:p:595-611
    DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2019.1570820
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01436597.2019.1570820
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/01436597.2019.1570820?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Nisar & Nafeesa bibi & Saba Malik & Naushad khan & Muhammad sakandar Majid, 2020. "Unification Of Former Fata With Kpk And Its Impact On Domestic Sanctuary," Cultural Communication and Socialization Journal (CCSJ), Zibeline International Publishing, vol. 1(2), pages 25-30, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ctwqxx:v:40:y:2019:i:3:p:595-611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ctwq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.